Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse
Here in this post, we are sharing the “Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse”. You can read psychometric and Author information. We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.
About Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse
Scale Name
Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse
Author Details
Christopher M. Murphy and Sharon A. Hoover (1999); Christopher M. Murphy, Sharon A. Hoover, and Casey Taft (1999)
Translation Availability
English

Background/Description
The Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse (MMEA), developed by Murphy and Hoover (1999) and Murphy, Hoover, and Taft (1999), is a 28-item self-report scale (reduced from an original 54 items) designed to assess emotional abuse in college students reporting on current or past dating relationships. Published in Violence and Victims and Family Violence: Prevention and Treatment (2nd ed.), the MMEA includes four subscales: Restrictive Engulfment (e.g., controlling behaviors, isolation), Hostile Withdrawal (e.g., silent treatment, emotional unavailability), Denigration (e.g., humiliation, belittling), and Dominance/Intimidation (e.g., threats, coercive tactics). The scale aims to capture the multifaceted nature of psychological abuse in dating relationships, emphasizing its impact on emotional well-being.
Participants rate the frequency of abusive behaviors over the past 6 months or relationship duration on a 7-point Likert scale (0 = “Never” to 6 = “More than 20 times”). Subscale scores range from 0–42 (7 items per subscale), with higher scores indicating greater emotional abuse. The MMEA was validated with 252 college students (mean age ≈ 20 years, ~60% female, U.S.-based), showing that 70–80% reported some form of emotional abuse, with 20–30% experiencing frequent denigration or restrictive engulfment. The scale correlates with depression (r ≈ 0.30–0.50), anxiety (r ≈ 0.25–0.45), and relationship dissatisfaction (r ≈ 0.35–0.55). It is used in clinical psychology, counseling, and public health to assess emotional abuse, guide intervention planning, and evaluate prevention programs.
Administration, Scoring and Interpretation
- Obtain the scale from Murphy and Hoover (1999) or authorized sources (e.g., Violence and Victims, Sage Publications), ensuring ethical permissions.
- Explain to participants (college students reporting on current or past dating relationships) that the questionnaire assesses experiences of emotional abuse, emphasizing confidentiality and voluntary participation.
- Administer the 28-item scale in a classroom, clinical, or controlled setting, using paper or digital formats, with instructions to rate frequency of experiences over the past 6 months or relationship duration.
- Estimated completion time is 8–12 minutes.
- Ensure a safe, distraction-free environment; provide support resources (e.g., campus counseling services) and adapt for accessibility (e.g., oral administration) if needed.
Reliability and Validity
The MMEA demonstrates strong psychometric properties (Murphy & Hoover, 1999). Internal consistency is high: Restrictive Engulfment (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.85), Hostile Withdrawal (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91), Denigration (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92), and Dominance/Intimidation (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91), based on a sample of 252 college students. Test-retest reliability is not explicitly reported but estimated as moderate to high (r ≈ 0.70–0.85 over 4–6 weeks) from similar emotional abuse measures.
Convergent validity is supported by correlations with the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (r ≈ 0.50–0.70; Tolman, 1989) and mental health measures (e.g., depression, r ≈ 0.30–0.50). Discriminant validity is evidenced by weak correlations with unrelated constructs like academic performance (r < 0.20). Factorial validity is confirmed by a four-factor structure. Pairing with measures like the Index of Psychological Abuse (Sullivan & Bybee, 1999) or the Composite Abuse Scale (Hegarty et al., 1999) enhances comprehensive assessment of emotional abuse.
Available Versions
28-Items
Reference
Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and victims, 14(1), 39.
Murphy, C. M., & Cascardi, M. (1999). Psychological abuse in marriage and dating relationships. In Family violence: Prevention and treatment (pp. 198-226). SAGE Publications, Inc..
Important Link
Scale File:
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse assess?
It assesses restrictive engulfment, hostile withdrawal, denigration, and dominance/intimidation in dating relationships.
Who is the target population?
College students reporting on current or past dating relationships.
How long does it take to administer?
Approximately 8–12 minutes.
Can it inform interventions?
Yes, it identifies emotional abuse patterns to guide counseling and prevention programs.
Disclaimer
Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.
Help Us Improve This Article
Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.
Share With Us
If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at [email protected]. We help others on behalf of you.