Stigma Scale Urdu Version

by Psychology Roots
169 views 7 minutes read

Stigma Scale Urdu Version

Here in this post, we are sharing the “Stigma Scale Urdu Version”. You can read psychometric and Author information.  We have thousands of Scales and questionnaires in our collection (See Scales and Questionnaires). You can demand us any scale and questionnaires related to psychology through our community, and we will provide you with a short time. Keep visiting Psychology Roots.

About Stigma Scale Urdu Version

Scale Name

Stigma Scale Urdu Version

Author Details

Michael King, Sokratis Dinos, and colleagues (original Stigma Scale, 2007); Urdu translation by Malik, N. I., and colleagues (2023)

Translation Availability

Urdu

Background/Description

The Stigma Scale, originally developed by King et al. (2007) and published in The British Journal of Psychiatry, is a 28-item self-report scale designed to measure perceived stigma associated with mental illness in adults. It assesses three dimensions: Discrimination (11 items, e.g., being treated differently due to mental illness), Disclosure (11 items, e.g., concerns about revealing mental health issues), and Positive Aspects (6 items, e.g., personal growth from experiences). The Urdu version, adapted by Malik et al. (2023) for use in Pakistan, was validated in the context of drug relapse among youth, as reported in Journal of Clinical Medicine. The adaptation ensures cultural and linguistic relevance for Urdu-speaking populations, addressing local attitudes toward mental health and substance use stigma.

Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = “Strongly Disagree” to 4 = “Strongly Agree”), with total scores ranging from 0–112 (Discrimination: 0–44, Disclosure: 0–44, Positive Aspects: 0–24). Higher scores indicate greater perceived stigma (except for Positive Aspects, where higher scores reflect positive perceptions). The Urdu version was validated with 400 young adults (mean age ≈ 18–30 years, predominantly male, Punjab, Pakistan), showing elevated stigma scores among those with substance use issues. It correlates with measures of psychological distress (r ≈ 0.40–0.60) and social support (r ≈ -0.30–0.50). The scale is used in clinical psychology, psychiatry, and public health in Pakistan to assess mental health stigma, particularly in substance use contexts, and to inform interventions. Access requires contacting the authors or publishers (e.g., Journal of Clinical Medicine).

Administration, Scoring and Interpretation

  • Obtain the Urdu version from Malik et al. (2023) or the original from King et al. (2007) via authorized sources (e.g., Journal of Clinical Medicine, The British Journal of Psychiatry), ensuring ethical permissions.
  • Explain to participants (adults 18+, particularly youth in Pakistan) that the questionnaire assesses perceptions of mental health stigma, emphasizing confidentiality and voluntary participation.
  • Administer the 28-item scale in a clinical, research, or community setting, using paper or digital formats, with instructions to rate statements based on current experiences of mental health stigma.
  • Estimated completion time is 8–12 minutes.
  • Ensure a private, supportive environment; provide mental health resources (e.g., crisis hotlines) and adapt for accessibility (e.g., oral administration for low literacy) if needed.

Reliability and Validity

The Urdu Stigma Scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties (Malik et al., 2023; King et al., 2007). Internal consistency is high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87 for total score; Discrimination = 0.83, Disclosure = 0.85, Positive Aspects = 0.80) based on a sample of 400 Pakistani youth. Test-retest reliability is moderate to high (r ≈ 0.70–0.85 over 2–4 weeks).

Convergent validity is supported by correlations with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (r ≈ 0.50–0.70) and measures of depression (r ≈ 0.40–0.60). Factorial validity confirms a three-factor structure (Discrimination, Disclosure, Positive Aspects), explaining 55–65% of variance. Criterion validity is evidenced by its ability to differentiate high-stigma (e.g., substance use) from low-stigma groups and sensitivity to intervention effects.

Discriminant validity is shown by weak correlations with unrelated constructs (e.g., general intelligence, r < 0.20). Pairing with measures like the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Urdu) or Beck Depression Inventory enhances comprehensive assessment.

Available Versions

27-Items

Reference

Malik, N. I., Saleem, S., Ullah, I., Rehan, S. T., De Berardis, D., & Atta, M. (2023). Psychosocial Factors Affecting Drug Relapse among Youth in Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of clinical medicine12(7), 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072686

King, M., Dinos, S., Shaw, J., Watson, R., Stevens, S., Passetti, F., … & Serfaty, M. (2007). The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illnessThe British Journal of Psychiatry190(3), 248-254.

Important Link

Scale File:

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Stigma Scale Urdu Version measure?
It measures perceived mental health stigma, focusing on discrimination, disclosure, and positive aspects.

Who is the target population?
Urdu-speaking adults (18+), particularly youth in Pakistan, in clinical or community settings.

How long does it take to administer?
Approximately 8–12 minutes.

Can it inform interventions?
Yes, it assesses stigma to guide mental health and substance use interventions.

Disclaimer

Please note that Psychology Roots does not have the right to grant permission for the use of any psychological scales or assessments listed on its website. To use any scale or assessment, you must obtain permission directly from the author or translator of the tool. Psychology Roots provides information about various tools and their administration procedures, but it is your responsibility to obtain proper permissions before using any scale or assessment. If you need further information about an author’s contact details, please submit a query to the Psychology Roots team.

Help Us Improve This Article

Have you discovered an inaccuracy? We put out great effort to give accurate and scientifically trustworthy information to our readers. Please notify us if you discover any typographical or grammatical errors.
Make a comment. We acknowledge and appreciate your efforts.

Share With Us

If you have any scale or any material related to psychology kindly share it with us at [email protected]. We help others on behalf of you.

Follow

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More